Prince Andrew’s Lawyer Seems In Federal Court, ‘Challenging Jurisdiction’ Of Sexual Assault Claim

A California attorney representing Prince Andrew vowed to contest a civil claim introduced forth with a lady accusing the British royal of sexually assaulting her when she was underage. 

Andrew B. Brettley indicated his intention to represent the Duke of You are able to hrs in front of a scheduled pretrial teleconference hearing within the Southern District of recent You are able to on Monday, based on recently filed court papers acquired by

The La-based lawyer filed notice of his special appearance “for the objective of contesting purported service of process and challenging jurisdiction” concerning the sexual assault civil situation introduced forth by Virginia Giuffre from the disgraced prince. 

The civil complaint alleges that Giuffre was “forced to possess sexual activity with Prince Andrew against her will,” on three separate occasions in 2001 in the behest of millionaire child molester Jeffrey Epstein.

She’s seeking “substantial damages” for “extreme emotional distress, humiliation, fear, mental trauma, lack of dignity and self-esteem, and invasion of her privacy.” 

“Prince Andrew’s actions constitute sexual offenses,” the complaint states.

Giuffre, who claims she was sex-trafficked around the world by Epstein, was 17 at that time. She maintains she was two times assaulted by Prince Andrew at Epstein’s New You are able to mansion, on his private Caribbean island, and also at co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell’s London apartment. 

Epstein was discovered dead inside a New You are able to jail cell after being arrested in This summer 2019. His dying was ruled a suicide. 

A personal investigator representing Giuffre offered Prince Andrew using the civil suit on August. 27, another court affidavit filed a week ago shows. The documents wound up with a officer guarding the gates from the Royal Lodge. 

Prince Andrew’s attorneys, however, who insist the legal documents weren’t delivered with the proper diplomatic channels, are actually attempting to achieve the situation thrown on legal technicalities.

“Boies Schiller Flexner LLP make several public, indeed well-publicised,attempts at irregular service of those proceedings within this jurisdiction, in a minumum of one

situation supported with a media representative,” Gary Bloxsome, a London-based attorney representing Prince Andrew authored inside a Sept. 6 letter to Barbara Fontaine, Senior Master from the Queen’s Bench Division.

The London attorney, disputing the legality from the private process server utilized by Giuffre’s Manhattan-based law practice, claimed the suit was incorrectly filed, based on worldwide law, and for that reason, moot. 

Citing the Hague Service Convention of 1965, a multilateral agreement managing the servicing of civil court papers abroad, Giuffre’s legal team erred by not delivering an hired court official for everyone the Duke of You are able to. The prince’s lawyer described such legal tactics as “regrettable” and “potentially defective.”

“These [attempts] have incorporated attempted personal service in our client at his home, the instruction of the private process server, and tries to email the proceedings not just to this firm, but to barristers (who aren’t authorised to conduct litigation) who are recognized to have acted for that Duke…We reiterate our client reserves all his legal rights, including to contest the jurisdiction of america courts.”

The U.S., which recognizes the Hague Service Convention, formally ratified it on April 14, 1967. 

Additionally, Prince Andrew’s legal team contended Giuffre’s “claim might not be viable,” quarrelling a document she signed in ’09 may bar any litigation within the matter.

Giuffre apparently signed a release barring her from taking legal actions against individuals linked to Epstein, included in another court settlement from the charged sex offender greater than twenty years ago. 

The royal’s lawyers reported the settlement’s possible role within the dismissal of the battery situation Giuffre introduced against Epstein’s former attorney, Alan Dershowtiz, that was ignored in August.

“Once we could get yourself a copy from the settlement agreement in Florida, which seems to become susceptible to confidentiality limitations, we can see whether Ms Giuffre includes a viable claim,” Bloxsome authored. “Obviously until we’ve made that determination, it is not easy for all of us to provide advice whether the Duke should under your own accord accept service.”

Prince Andrew’s legal team didn’t immediately react to’s request comment all around the situation Monday.

In 2019, Prince Andrew, who denied ever meeting Giuffre — despite photo taking evidence — announced he’d take a step back from public existence within the allegations. He vowed to help U.S. investigators if known as upon.

“It did not happen,” the Duke of You are able to told BBC Newsnight. “I can absolutely categorically let you know it never happened. I’ve no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever.”

Recently, government bodies within the U.K. announced they’d investigate sexual abuse allegations from the prince.

Crime Time is the place to go for true crime tales from around the globe, breaking crime news, and knowledge about Archiweekend’s original true crime shows and documentaries. Register for Archiweekend Insider for best wishes true crime content. 

Written by Stephanie Green

I am dreamer and book reader.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Boyfriend Charged With Murder Of Lady Discovered By Her Estranged Husband, Kids

Jury Will Quickly Deliberate On Robert Durst’s Fate In Murder Trial