Michael Jackson’s estate won another legal victory now once the court ignored a lawsuit filed by among the men featured within the documentary “Leaving Neverland.”
Wade Robson, 38, filed a reported $1.5 billion civil suit against Jackson’s estate in 2013, claiming the singer had sexually mistreated him several occasions between seven and 14. Jackson met Robson as they was part of an Australian talent troupe and that he made an appearance within the singer’s “Black or White-colored,” “Jam” and “Heal the planet” videos like a boy.
On Monday, Judge Mark A. Youthful ignored Robson’s civil suit in La County Superior Court, discovering that MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, the defendants within the situation, aren’t responsible for Jackson’s actions, as other product legal duty or capability to control him.
“There’s no evidence supporting plaintiff’s contention that defendants worked out control of Jackson,” Youthful authored. “Evidence further shows that defendants didn’t have legal capability to control Jackson because Jackson had complete and total possession from the corporate defendants.”
Youthful had ignored an identical suit filed by James Safechuck in October. Safechuck also made an appearance within the 2019 Funnel 4/Cinemax documentary “Leaving Neverland,” by which he claimed that, like Robson, he was frequently mistreated and raped by Jackson at his home, Neverland Ranch, and other locations.
Robson’s attorney Vince Finaldi stated he would appeal the choice.
“If permitted to face, the choice would set a harmful precedent that will leave a large number of children employed in the entertainment industry susceptible to sexual abuse by persons in places of power,” Finaldi stated inside a statement, the Connected Press reported.
Jonathan Steinsapir, who’s representing the Jackson estate, stated inside a statement that Robson “has spent the final eight years going after frivolous claims in various lawsuits.
“Robson has had nearly three dozen depositions and inspected and presented thousands and thousands of documents attempting to prove his claims, yet the court has once more ruled that Robson’s claims don’t have any merit whatsoever, that no trial is essential, which his latest situation is ignored,” he stated.
Robson and Safechuck’s ongoing lawsuits from the Jackson estate were ignored with a judge in 2017, who discovered that the time limit within their cases had expired. However the cases were elevated in 2019 after California passed Set up Bill 218, which enables survivors of childhood sexual assault additional time to report abuse.
“Leaving Neverland ” premiered in the Sundance Film Festival. It caused both a reassessment from the pop icon’s career as well as an uproar among Jackson’s group of followers after it aired on a double edged sword on Cinemax later that year. Two rebuttal documentaries — “Michael Jackson: Chase the Truth” and “Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary” — soon adopted, challenging the claims made on “Finding Neverland” and including interviews which were purportedly overlooked from that film.
Cinemax and also the Jackson estate are actually headed to arbitration inside a suit filed from the network after it aired “Leaving Neverland.” In December, a lesser court’s ruling that the non-disparagement clause signed by Cinemax nearly 3 decades ago was still being valid. That agreement is made while Cinemax was collaborating with Jackson on the live performance discharge of his Harmful tour.“Leaving Neverland” director Dan Reed is presently filming a follow up to his documentary which will feature the continuing lawsuits, Deadline reported in October.
Crime Time is the place to go for true crime tales from around the globe, breaking crime news, and knowledge about Archiweekend’s original true crime shows and documentaries. Register for Archiweekend Insider for best wishes true crime content.